Conversations with CSCI 105

I was most interested in the variety of the projects! One student was focused on actuarial science, and the other student was working on compiling a soccer player evaluation system. Like most collaborative work, our various experiences and disciplines offered a more complete picture on students’ views and uses of LLMs.

The most useful feedback I received for my project was clarification of scope. In our discussion, I asked about specifics and asked them, individually, about their own ethics. I was mainly focused on asking if it might be problematic to outline minority and immigrant spaces in this specific political climate. Especially in the context of branding a small business as immigrant-owned may have unwanted consequences.

Concise timeline:

  • Every Thursday night
    • October 22nd – Data collection, what cultural spaces do I hope to include?
    • October 29th – Familiarize myself with ArcGIS//Storymapping
    • November 5th – Create at least half of the intended cultural spaces
    • November 12th – Create the second half
    • November 18th, Wednesday Class – Lightning Talk Workshop
    • November 19th – Polish Story map
    • November 23rd, Wednesday Class – Peer Review + Revisions
    • November 24th – Date of completion
    • November 30 – December 2nd, in class – Due date

Grammarly was used for spelling and grammar purposes. No other LLMs were included in this blog process.

One thought on “Conversations with CSCI 105”

  1. I agree, a lot of their projects were super interesting. I think clarifying as much as possible is a good route. It helps with the readers but also yourself to know what to focus on exactly.

Leave a Reply